If mining companies don’t pay the full cost of cleanup, the public may be stuck with the liability.

BC has made progress on mine reclamation – but serious risks remain. Our report, Next Steps for Responsible Mining: Improving Bonding and Reclamation in BC, reveals how the province’s system for ensuring mining companies pay for environmental cleanup when operations end, even with recent changes, still leaves taxpayers and communities exposed to potentially massive cleanup costs.

Jordan River And Contaminated Bank

Long after the copper mine closed in 1974, Jordan River (pictured above) and the surrounding watershed is still contaminated from remaining waste materials.

In BC, mining companies are required to restore land and water disturbed by mining activities and they must provide funds up front – known as a bond – to guarantee that work will get done. The goal is to hold 100% of the estimated reclamation costs in the bond as security.

While BC has increased the amount of new bonds since a 2022 policy change, there is still a significant shortfall between these bonds and the cost of reclamation. This difference may be a larger problem than it appears on the surface as evidence suggests that the original cost estimates may be much less than the actual costs of mine cleanup.

Next Steps for Responsible Mining clearly explains issues with the current regime and points to other mining jurisdictions – such as Nevada—that require transparent, publicly reviewed processes for cost estimates and bonding calculations.

Responsible mining requires enforceable rules, transparency and full public accountability to ensure communities aren’t left paying the price decades down the road.

Report:

Next Steps for Responsible Mining: Improving Bonding and Reclamation in BC

Media:

New report exposes billion-dollar blind spot: Wildsight (2026 May 08) East Kootenay News Online Weekly